Tricking vs Tricking, While Having It

In recent years, a new philosophy has arisen. Stemming mostly from the hip-hop culture, this new train of thought looks to remove the tag of "john" from those who can pay for it. This not-so-new ideology is coming back with a renewed fervor, as ugly niggas who can't get a woman to like them start to get money.

For the next few moments, our subject is "It AIN'T trickin if I got it???"

Since the beginning of pussy, there have been losers willing to pay for it. Women, knowing what fools men (and some women) are, have been willing to exploit this for just as long. Especially in times like now, when economic conditions are rough, and she might need that Louis Vuitton purse...why NOT fuck Lil Wayne for a couple G's? Why NOT have 50's baby and collect exorbitant amounts of child support for 18 years? Why NOT blow Gary Coleman and....nevermind, bad example. You get the picture though.

Truthfully, I disagree. By the same reasoning as "it ain't trickin if you got it," then "it ain't homo if you don't swallow" or "it ain't murder if you rob em first." Completely illogical.

Trickin == trickin, whether or not you "have it." Just like "fuckin somebody in the ass" is gay whether it's male or female...(even if you were drunk, and she ASKED you to do it, and you only did it once...or twice...ok six times) it's still not acceptable.

I'm really curious as to how these assholes can justify indemnification of prostituation, just on the basis that they can AFFORD it. If YOU understand, please help ME the fuck out.

My opinion: It IS trickin....even if you got it. Fuckers.